Jump to content

Zapus luteus

From WhiskerWiki

Southern Meadow Jumping Mouse
(Zapus luteus)
Range
Taxonomic classification
Order:Rodentia
Suborder:Supramyomorpha
Infraorder:Myomorphi
Superfamily:Dipodoidea
Family:Zapodidae
Genus:Zapus
Binomial details
Zapus luteus G. S. Miller, 1911

Genetic analyses by Malaney et al. (2017) revealed that the subspecies Zapus hudsonius pallidus is closely related to the subspecies Zapus princeps luteus and that together they are more related to each other than to other subspecies in Z. hudsonius and Z. princeps. As a result, Malaney et al. (2017) proposed moving both subspecies to Zapus luteus. Southwestern populations represent a distinctive subspecies, Zapus luteus luteus, and jumping mice from the southern Great Plains represent subspecies Zapus luteus pallidus. The work of Malaney et al. (2017) has importantly exposed cryptic diversity and putative new species within Zapus. Further studies will be needed to fully understand new species boundaries and morphological variation.

Description

A formal species description for this taxon as delineated by Malaney et al. (2017) does not currently exist. The following descriptions from Krutzsch (1954) are provided for subspecies that Malaney et al. (2017) subsumed under this taxon.

From Krutzsch (1954) for the southwestern portion of the range (formerly of Zapus princeps luteus): "Size, small; back near Ochraceous-Buff, having black hair interspersed; mid-dorsal band not always well marked; sides Ochraceous-Buff with fine admixture of black hair; lateral line blending with Ochraceous-Buff of sides, not distinct; ventral surface white to base of hairs, in some cases lightly suffused with color of sides; tail indistinctly bicolored, tan to grayish-white below and brown above; hind feet grayish-white above; ears brownish, narrowly edged with Ochraceous-Buff; skull small; antorbital foramina relatively large; interorbital region broad; inferior ramus of the zygomatic process of the maxillary broad, often with medial projection; incisive foramina narrow posteriorly becoming broadly rounded anteriorly; palatal bridge relatively long; pterygoid fossae narrow; zygomatic arches relatively robust; nasals tapering at each end."

From Krutzsch (1954) for the northeastern portion of the range (formerly of Zapus hudsonius pallidus): "Size small; back near Cinnamon-Buff with admixture of dark-tipped hair forming distinct, broad, dorsal band; sides bright Cinnamon-Buff with sparse mixture of dark-tipped hair; lateral line usually distinct, of clear Cinnamon-Buff; belly white, sometimes with suffusion of color of sides, tail bicolored, brownish to brownish-black above, grayish-white to yellowish-white below; ears dark, narrowly edged with color of sides; feet white to grayish-white above; mastoid region relatively narrow; maxillary tooth-row relatively short; zygomata relatively short; zygomatic arch relatively broad; interorbital region relatively broad; auditory bullae relatively small and narrow; lateral margins of nasals not constricted posteriorly."

From Frey (2007) for the southwestern portion of the range (formerly of Zapus hudsonius luteus): "Upperparts bright orangeish or dark blonde and lacking a prominent dark mid-dorsal band (i.e., back is only slightly darker than sides and colors merge gradually; ears lacking distinct white or light buffy border but may have an orangeish tan border."

Placeholder image
Image needed. Please let us know if you have have an image that you would like to contribute.

External measurements

Length measurements are in millimeters (mm) and weight measurements are in grams (g), unless stated otherwise. If available, the sample size (n=) is provided. If a range is not provided and n= is not given, then the listed measurement represents an average.

Part of range Reference Total length Tail length Hindfoot length Ear length Mass
Arizona, New Mexico Frey (2007) 194–235 (n=47) 114–145 (n=47) 28–34 (n=47) 10–19 (n=47) 14.0–28.5 (n=47)
Nebraska Johnsgard (2020) 180–220 115–136 12–22


Skull

Placeholder image
Image(s) coming soon. We are currently imaging this skull.

Similar species

Where Zapus luteus is sympatric with the Southwestern Jumping Mouse (Zapus princeps), the two species may be differentiated based on color. Zapus luteus luteus (southwestern portion of the species range) has an overall coloration that is orange, an indistinct dorsal stripe, and the ears lack a white fringe; whereas Z. princeps has olive-yellow sides, a distinct blackish dorsal stripe, and the ears have a prominent white fringe (Frey, 2008). Differentiating Zapus hudsonius and Zapus luteus in the field may not currently be possible using morphological characters. A formal taxonomic revision of Zapus luteus is needed and may identify suitable characters for differentiating these species.

  • Borrowed from Frey (2008): "Skins of two Z. h. luteus (bottom) from near Mora, Mora County (NMMNH 1228, 1229), and two Z. p. princeps (top) from Coyote Creek, Mora County (NMMNH 4040, 4042). Note the prominent white ear fringe, distinct blackish dorsal strip, and olive-yellow sides in Z. p. princeps, and lack of an ear fringe, overall orange coloration and indistinct dorsal strip in Z. h. luteus.
  • Ranges of Zapus luteus and Zapus princeps.
  • Ranges of Zapus luteus and Zapus hudsonius. The extent of the area of sympatry is not shown.

Frey (2008) noted that the ears of Zapus princeps have a prominent white fringe and found it a useful character for distinguishing Zapus princeps and Zapus hudsonius luteus, which is now considered a distinct species, Zapus luteus. After reviewing Krutzsch (1954) and Malaney et al. (2017), it appears that the color of the ear fringe is useful for distinguishing Z. luteus from sympatric Z. princeps. In the northeastern portion of the range where Z. luteus (as described by Malaney et al. 2017) may co-occur with Z. hudsonius, the ears of both species are dark and narrowly edged with the color of sides or edged with ochraceous. Under Malaney et al.'s (2017) proposed species boundaries, the ear fringe character is useful for distinguishing Z. luteus from Z. princeps, but not Z. luteus from Z. hudsonius. See the Taxonomic notes section under Zapus for how the ear fringe character noted by Krutzsch (1954) was evaluated and applied to Malaney et al.'s (2017) species delimitations.

  • In much of their range, Zapus hudsonius lack white fringes on the ears.
  • Zapus princeps ears are dark and edged with white or yellowish-white.

Jones (1981) noted that the shape and attachment of the paracone to the M1 and M2 (upper molars) was helpful for differentiating species of Zapus. Using Malaney et al. (2017) delimitations, we find that for Z. luteus and Z. hudsonius (except for portions of Alaska, and Yukon Territory) the paracone in the M1 and M2 is isolated, while the paracone in the M1 and M2 is attached to the body of the tooth in Z. princeps. See the Taxonomic notes section under Zapus for how the M1 and M2 characters noted by Jones (1981) were evaluated and applied to Malaney et al.'s (2017) species delimitations.

Placeholder image
Image(s) coming soon. We are currently imaging this character.

Taxonomic notes

Malaney et al. (2017) recognized 9 species within Zapus, elevating some of the subspecies within the genus to species status. Genetic analyses by Malaney et al. (2017) revealed that Zapus hudsonius pallidus is closely related to Zapus princeps luteus and that together they are more related to each other than to other members in either species. As a result, Malaney et al. (2017) proposed moving both subspecies to Zapus luteus. Southwestern populations represent a distinctive subspecies, Zapus luteus luteus, and jumping mice from the southern Great Plains represent subspecies Zapus luteus pallidus. The work of Malaney et al. (2017) has importantly exposed cryptic diversity and putative new species within Zapus. Further studies will be needed to fully understand new species boundaries and morphological variation.

  • Zapus hudsonius subspecies boundaries as defined by Krutzsch (1954).
  • Zapus princeps subspecies boundaries as defined by Krutzsch (1954).
  • Zapus luteus range based on genetic analyses and niche-based geographic distribution modeling by Malaney et al. (2017).

References

Frey JK. 2007. Key to the rodents of New Mexico. Final report submitted to New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Frey JK. 2008. Morphology and genetics of the New Mexico meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius luteus). Final Report submitted to New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Johnsgard PA. 2020. Wildlife of Nebraska: a natural history. Lincoln (NE, USA): University of Nebraska Press.

Jones GS. 1981. The systematics and biology of the genus Zapus (Mammalia, Rodentia, Zapodidae)(Canada, United States) (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana State University).

Krutzsch PH. 1954. North American jumping mice (genus Zapus). Lawrence, KS, USA: University of Kansas. Link

Malaney JL, Demboski JR, Cook JA. 2017. Integrative species delimitation of the widespread North American jumping mice (Zapodinae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 114:137-152.

Miller Jr GS. 1911-12-23. A new jumping-mouse from New Mexico. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 24:253-254.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.